Stephen Colbert Is A Cock Holster

Last Saturday the press poodles had their White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner without President Trump in attendance.  The President was in Harrisburg, PA holding a rally.

“A large group of Hollywood actors and Washington media are consoling each other in a hotel ballroom in our nation’s capital right now. They are gathered together for the White House Correspondents' Dinner without the president. And I could not possibly be more thrilled than to be 100 miles away from Washington’s swamp, spending my evening with all of you and with a much, much larger crowd and much better people,” he said.

To raucous booing from the crowd, the President trashed outlets such as CNN and MSNBC as "fake news" and called the wider Washington media elite "a disgrace." 

The following day the President was interviewed by CBS’s John Dickerson for CBS This Morning

The interview which aired Monday, showed Dickerson pressing the President to explain his March tweets claiming Obama wiretapped him during the 2016 election.

"You're the president of the United States," Dickerson said. "You said he was 'sick and bad' because he had tapped you."

"You can take it any way you want," Trump replied as he abruptly ended the interview.

Monday evening Stephen Colbert, host of CBS’ Late Night with Stephen Colbert, took issue with the President’s dismissal of Dickerson saying, “When you insult one member of the CBS family, you insult us all! Bazinga!”

"John Dickerson is a fair-minded journalist, and one of the most competent people who will ever walk into your office, and you treat him like that. Mr. President, you're not the POTUS, you're the 'gloat-us.' You're the glutton with the button. You're a regular 'Gorge Washington.' You're the 'presi-dunce,' but you're turning into a real 'prick-tator."

"Sir, you attract more skinheads than free Rogaine. You have more people marching against you than cancer. You talk like a sign language gorilla that got hit in the head. In fact, the only thing your mouth is good for is being Vladimir Putin's cock holster."

Being a sewer mouth passes for humor these days.  Just ask DNC Chairman Tom Perez.  Maybe we should check our outrage with Rosie O’Donnell:

@brithume BRAVO - THANK YOU STEPHEN - WE WISH ALL OUR TALENT WAS AS BRAVE AND INSIGHTFUL AS U R - KEEP DOING JUST WHAT U R DOING #COLBERT

— ROSIE (@Rosie) May 2, 2017

Take a look at John Dickerson.  He imbues the image of a panty-waist, a weak sister.  How humiliating must it be to need an unfunny comic to come to your defense?

As for Colbert, it takes a cock holster to know a cock holster.  All the fan boys are suffering from a terminal case of blue balls since The World’s Most Dangerous Community Organizer left office. 

I think we all remember watching Johnny Carson during Watergate, quipping about Nixon "choking down miles and miles of cock." #FireColbert

— Jim Treacher (@jtLOL) May 3, 2017

UPDATE 10:47 PM 5-3-2017:  A spokeswoman from CBS’s Late Show continues to disregard requests for comment.  Colbert, however, finally responded late Wednesday to online criticism saying, “So while I would do it again, I would change a few words that were cruder than they needed to be.  I had a few choice insults for the president…I don’t regret that.  He, I believe, can take care of himself,  I have jokes; he has the launch codes.  So, it’s a fair fight.

You can take action against CBS and this filthy little man by going to this link and filing a formal complaint with the Federal Communications Commission. 

Chuck Todd: Mean Tweets Edition

President Trump’s heated press conference press ass-chewing was met with hissy fits and pearl clutching of epic proportion by members of the mainstream Obama sycophant media.  Chuck Todd proclaimed they are not the enemy of the American people.

John Dickerson, host of CBS’s Face the Nation, admitted the American people have lost faith in the media’s credibility noting, “The press did all that good work ruining its reputation on its own and we can have a long conversation about what created that.”

I would hope that our leaders would never believe that any American desires to make another American an enemy. Let's dial it back.

— Chuck Todd (@chucktodd) February 17, 2017

Remember when the WH compared the GOP to terrorists in 2013? Good times. https://t.co/Xnzpsj8dHz

— The🐰FOO (@PolitiBunny) February 18, 2017

"You can put half of Trump supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables"

—Hillary Clinton, Chuck's lost candidate https://t.co/VrALMKiJR4

— Asa J 🇺🇸 (@asamjulian) February 17, 2017

.@chucktodd Remember when you guys chuckled as Hillary said the Republicans were the enemies she was most proud of? #GoodTimes

— Carl Gustav (@CaptYonah) February 17, 2017

The difference: With Obama, from Day One, WH press all wanted an exclusive. With Trump, they all wanted to be the cause of his impeachment.

— Matt Mackowiak (@MattMackowiak) February 18, 2017

Were reporters always such drama queens?

— Rebecca de Winter (@BlazerMc88) February 18, 2017

UPDATE:  Welcome readers of The Pirates Cove.  We wish to thank the good Admiral for linking to this post. 

Namby Pamby Democratic Presidential Candidates And The ISIS Savages (God Help Us All)

I set my DVR to record the second Democratic Debate moderated by CBS because I wanted to watch the football game between LSU and Arkansas.  During commercial breaks I’d peek in.

I had read earlier in the day that CBS was proposing changing the format of the debate to discuss the attacks in Paris that took place on Friday.  According to CNN’s Carol Costello, a Sanders aide “lost it” during a conference call saying he did not want the focus to be on foreign policy.

Jazz Shaw, who blogs at Hot Air, shared his thoughts on how the candidates might address what to do about ISIS prior to the start of the debate:

“These three Democrats are great at talking about mass shootings and violence so long as the shooters are either American police officers or racist lunatics. They know just how to answer those questions in a way to most strongly impress their base. Go after the cops in the former case or the NRA in the latter. It comes as easy as a fish takes to water. But what will they say when the death and mayhem is being ladled out on a truly massive scale and the perpetrators are the villains of ISIS who Obama has been so completely ineffective in defeating?”

So here’s the part of the transcript that dealt with that subject:

DICKERSON:  All right, thank you, Governor. Thank all of you. 

The terror attacks last night underscore biggest challenge facing the next president of the United States. At a time of crisis, the country and the world look to the president for leadership and for answers. 

So, Secretary Clinton, I'd like to start with you. Hours before the attacks, President Obama said, "I don't think ISIS is gaining strength." Seventy-two percent of Americans think the fight against ISIS is going badly. Won't the legacy of this administration, which is-- which you were a part of, won't that legacy be that it underestimated the threat from ISIS? 

CLINTON:  Well, John, I think that we have to look at ISIS as the leading threat of an international terror network. It cannot be contained, it must be defeated. 

There is no question in my mind that if we summon our resources, both our leadership resources and all of the tools at our disposal, not just military force, which should be used as a last resort, but our diplomacy, our development aid, law enforcement, sharing of intelligence in a much more open and cooperative way—that we can bring people together. 

But it cannot be an American fight. And I think what the president has consistently said—which I agree with—is that we will support those who take the fight to ISIS. That is why we have troops in Iraq that are helping to train and build back up the Iraqi military, why we have special operators in Syria working with the Kurds and Arabs, so that we can be supportive. 

But this cannot be an American fight, although American leadership is essential. 

DICKERSON:  But as—Secretary Clinton, the question was about, was ISIS underestimated? And I'll just add, the president referred to ISIS as the JV, in a speech at the Council of Foreign Relations in June of 2014 said, "I could not have predicted the extent to which ISIS could be effective in seizing cities in Iraq." 

So you've got prescriptions for the future, but how do we even know those prescriptions are any good if you missed it in the past? 

CLINTON: Well, John, look, I think that what happened when we abided by the agreement that George W. Bush made with the Iraqis to leave by 2011, is that an Iraqi army was left that had been trained and that was prepared to defend Iraq. Unfortunately, Nouri al-Maliki, the prime minister, set about decimating it. And then, with the revolution against Assad—and I did early on say we needed to try to find a way to train and equip moderates very early so that we would have a better idea of how to deal with Assad because I thought there would be extremist groups filling the vacuum. 

So, yes, this has developed. I think that there are many other reasons why it has in addition to what happened in the region, but I don't think that the United States has the bulk of the responsibility. I really put that on Assad and on the Iraqis and on the region itself. 

DICKERSON: Okay, Governor O'Malley, would you critique the administration's response to ISIS. If the United States doesn't lead, who leads? 

O'MALLEY:  John, I would disagree with Secretary Clinton respectfully on this score. 

This actually is America's fight. It cannot solely be America's fight. 

America is best when we work in collaboration with our allies. America is best when we are actually standing up to evil in this world. And ISIS, make no mistake about it, is an evil in this world. 

ISIS has brought down a Russian airliner. ISIS has now attacked a western democracy in—in France. And we do have a role in this. Not solely ours, but we must work collaboratively with other nations. 

The great failing of these last 10 or 15 years, John, has been our failing of human intelligence on the ground. Our role in the world is not to roam the globe looking for new dictators to topple. Our role in the world is to make ourselves a beacon of hope. Make ourselves stronger at home, but also our role in the world, yes, is also to confront evil when it rises. We took out the safe haven in Afghanistan, but now there is, undoubtedly, a larger safe haven and we must rise to this occasion in collaboration and with alliances to confront it, and invest in the future much better human intelligence so we know what the next steps are. 

DICKERSON:  Senator Sanders, you said you want to rid the planet of ISIS. In the previous debate you said the greatest threat to national security was climate change. Do you still believe that? 

I thought you’d rather watch the video than read the transcript, so here’s Bernie’s socialist “hotcoldwetdry” climate change insanity.