Oh The Obamity!

"If you like your Zeppelin, you can keep your Zeppelin." ~ Capt. Barack "Max" Obama, Pilot

We're All Gonna Die ... Richer

The Democrats are howling bloody Armageddon as the GOP reform tax bill is set to be passed today by the House. Procedural difficulties in the Senate made it necessary for the bill to be passed again in the House.

Given that the death of Net Neutrality has been followed on its heels by the GOP tax plan, the outcry from liberals is impressive.

Appearing on CNBC Monday, Harvard economist and former Obama and Clinton administration official Larry Summers warned that if the Senate tax bill becomes law, about 10,000 people will die every year who otherwise would have lived. If anything, his estimate isn’t pessimistic enough. 

The reason why is that the bill repeals the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, an unpopular but necessary provision that stabilizes insurance markets and wards off something known as an “adverse selection death spiral,” which can cause entire insurance markets to collapse. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that, if the individual mandate is repealed, 13 million fewer Americans will be insured by 2027.

And I thought that the libs wanted to reduce the world's carbon footprint by eliminating most everyone who had carbon feet?

As Obama's "Enrich The Insurance Companies' Bottom Line" Individual Mandate is now another resident of the historical dust bin, many of those uninsured are very likely to be young people who figure they can do without insurance. And in my experience, many welfare recipients abuse the living daylights out of healthcare services provided by the taxpayer.

It got so bad in my city that the police were instructed to respond to every ambulance call that went out. We had to evaluate whether or not the call was legitimate. This was done because welfare people who were drunk, bored or crazy were constantly calling for an ambulance to take them to an emergency room. We were responding to over 12,000 ambulance calls a year until the Chief finally eliminated that requirement. We just got too busy.

Hyperbole aside and curious as to how the GOP tax plan would affect me, I ran some numbers for myself using Maxim Lott's income tax estimator, Under the new tax act I will (may? might? could?) pay $1,000 less in federal income tax. I will use these funds to invest in corporations that produce body bags.

Just in case...

You Can Stand Me Up At The Gates Of Hell But I Won't Back Down

Kamala Harris (D-CA) has been known to advance progressive claptrap prior to her tenure as a US Senator and has doubled down on that BS since taking office.

Let’s take a look, shall we?

Here's the truth: infrastructure spending isn't a transportation issue for most Americans — it's a human rights issue.

— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) January 25, 2017

They can spin this all they want, but the Muslim Ban is unconstitutional and an affront to our values. https://t.co/TJD3lZ3gO7

— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) May 10, 2017

Sessions lacks all credibility to be the head of the Department of Justice. He should have resigned months ago.

— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) May 11, 2017

On May 4, this astonishingly clueless woman claimed via two tweets that under the Republican health care bill "129 million people with pre-existing conditions could be denied coverage and insurers could charge sick people more money."

Once again, 129M people with pre-existing conditions could be denied coverage and insurers could charge sick people more money.

— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) May 4, 2017

This lie, yes, lie is typical of the left.  Clearly, they know that Obamacare is dying on the vine.  Every damned one of them is terrified of its repeal and replacement knowing its catastrophic effects have doomed their Party.  They obfuscate the facts for the expressed purpose of scaring the beejeezus out of low information voters.  Her lie was called out by The Washington Post giving it four Pinocchios.

WaPo stridently pointed out:

A 2010 investigation by the House Energy and Commerce Committee found that companies denied coverage to one out of every seven applicants. So that would be 14 percent. Even if you took the entire US population with health insurance—about 257 million people—that means 34 million would face a denial of coverage. Within the individual market—assuming every state sought a waiver—the result would be 2.5 million, assuming they all experienced a lapse in coverage of more than two months.

When CNN’s Jake Tapper questioned her false claims she hemmed and hawed refusing to back down. 

Mind you, it’s only been a week since the House passed the AHCA, but a Quinnipiac University poll of 1,078 voters showed disapproval at 56 percent.  The approval was just 21 percent, four points higher than the last survey on the issue.

Twenty-three percent of respondents said they didn't know or couldn't answer the question.

So there you have it. Kamala and her fellow liars are doing their dead-level best to taint anything the Republicans do to lower deductibles, provide affordable coverage, provide better care with zero cuts to Medicaid.

NOTE:  We apologize to Tom Petty for appropriating lyrics attributed to him for the title of this post.

Here Are The 20 Republicans Who Voted Against Repeal Of Obamacare

Twenty Republicans bucked their party and voted against the health care overhaul on Thursday.

More than half of the members who voted “no” are part of the Tuesday Group, a collection of moderate House Republicans. Nine of the lawmakers represent districts that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton carried in November. President Donald Trump carried the districts of 11 of the members voting “no”, but all of the lawmakers outperformed Trump last fall.

Fourteen of the “no” votes are Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee targets. Five of the lawmakers are also part of the National Republican Campaign Committee’s Patriot Program, which assists members in tough races.

Andy Biggs – Congressman Andy Biggs of Arizona felt that the American Health Care Act does not go far enough in repealing Obamacare. “I have opposed the AHCA from the very beginning because it is not a clean repeal of Obamacare,” he said in a statement. “While I applaud all the hard work of the House Freedom Caucus, which has made every effort in recent weeks to improve this legislation, the final bill unfortunately does not meet the promises I made to my constituents.”

Mike Coffman – Congressman Coffman said he opposed the bill because it does not do enough to protect those with pre-existing conditions. “I worry that, under the current language, a small percentage of those with preexisting conditions may not be adequately protected,” he said in a statement. “If House Leadership will work to tighten protections for those with preexisting conditions, I’m a yes on sending this bill to the Senate for further consideration. If not, I’m a no, and we’ll go back to the drawing board to clean up the mess created by the Affordable Care Act.” Clearly, he did not feel the House ended up doing enough to protect people with pre-existing conditions.

[The DCCC has targeted Coffman for the 2018 midterms]

Barbara Comstock – Congresswoman Barbara Comstock of Virginia says that Obamacare is in a death spiral, but she’s not convinced that the American Health Care Act will actually lower costs. “While this bill addressed important principles like covering pre-existing conditions and not having lifetime limits imposed on the sick, and reducing costs and increasing choices for many working families, the uncertainties in the current version of the bill caused me not to be able to support it today,” she said in a statement.

[Comstock is a vulnerable incumbent seeking reelection in 2018]

[The DCCC has targeted Comstock for the 2018 midterms]

Ryan A. Costello – Congressman Ryan Costello of Pennsylvania said that the AHCA doesn’t do enough to protect people with pre-existing conditions. “Protections for those with pre-existing conditions without contingency and affordable access to coverage for every American remain my priorities for advancing healthcare reform, and this bill does not satisfy those benchmarks for me,” he said in a statement. “I do believe substantial reforms need to be made to our healthcare system. I will review any future modifications or legislation with these principles in mind, but I remain a no vote on this bill in its current form.”

[The DCCC has targeted Costello for the 2018 midterms]

Charlie Dent – Congressman Charlie Deny of Pennsylvania said that the AHCA will leave too many people uninsured. “Too many people are going to be losing coverage,” he told CNN.  “Those are my underlying concerns. The new revised version does not address those concerns and that’s why I’m opposed to the bill.”

Dan Donovan – Congressman Dan Donovan of New York was not a fan of the fact that the bill exempts New York State counties from contributing to the state’s Medicaid coffers but does not include New York City in that exemption. “The provision excludes New York City, putting an unfair and disproportionate burden on City residents to cover the state’s exorbitant Medicaid expenses,” he said in a statement. “We need healthcare reform – including promised Medicaid reform in New York where we spend more than Texas, Florida and Pennsylvania combined – but it shouldn’t be done on the backs of already overburdened City residents who will undoubtedly have a tax increase forced on them to pay for this eminently unfair policy.”

Brian Fitzpatrick – Congressman Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania said that the bill does not adequately address the opioid epidemic. “I have many concerns with this bill, and first among them is the impact on the single most important issue plaguing Bucks and Montgomery Counties, and the issue that I have made my priority in Congress: opioid abuse prevention, treatment and recovery,” he said in a statement.

[Fitzpatrick is a vulnerable incumbent seeking reelection in 2018]

Jaime Herrera Beutler – Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler of Washington said that the bill does not provide an adequate safety net for kids who depend on Medicaid. “While I appreciate this week’s effort by Speaker Ryan and his leadership team to better protect older Americans from health care cost increases, the difficulties this bill would create for millions of children were left unaddressed,” she said in a statement. “I’m disappointed that it appears my amendment to strengthen the Medicaid safety net for the kids who depend on it for their health care will not be considered. Protecting vulnerable children is a core purpose of the Medicaid program and when the program fails to do so, it fails entirely. I will not vote to let those kids fall through the cracks.”

[The DCCC has targeted Herrera Beutler for the 2018 midterms]

Will Hurd – Congressman Hurd said in a statement, “Since the implementation of Obamacare, I’ve told my constituents that the only meaningful metric when it comes to healthcare is actual access to quality, affordable care – not just health insurance. While the goal of Obamacare was to make healthcare more accessible and more affordable, it has done just the opposite. Likewise, while the goal of the American Health Care Act was to combat the skyrocketing premiums and outrageous deductibles millions of Americans face, it too, falls short.”

[Hurd is a vulnerable incumbent seeking reelection in 2018]

[The DCCC has targeted Hurd for the 2018 midterms]

Walter B. Jones – Congressman Walter Jones of North Carolina said that the bill was rushed and highly flawed, and he added that he has heard loud and clear from his constituents that they don’t like it. “It’s time to scrap this flawed bill and start over,” he said in a statement. “Go out across the country, gather people’s input, and use an open, public process to thoughtfully craft a bill that delivers the relief the American people need.”

David Joyce – Congressman Joyce said, “I’m eager to support legislation that doesn’t reduce funding in the Medicare trust fund and actually helps lower healthcare costs for the more than 465,000 people in my district who obtain their health insurance via their employer. Those individuals, who make up 65 percent of the district, have seen nothing but higher premiums, higher deductibles, and higher co-pays. We need to find solutions to help them and their families. The middle class cannot keep bearing the brunt of everything.”

John Katko – Congressman John Katko said that he felt the AHCA penalizes states that expanded Medicaid under Obamacare. He also said he was not convinced it will lower costs. “I’m not going to vote for a bill where I don’t know what it looks like until it’s done,” he said, according to Syracuse.com.

[The DCCC has targeted Katko for the 2018 midterms]

Leonard Lance – Congressman Leonard Lance of New Jersey said that the AHCA will not lower costs. “I do not think that it lowers premiums, and I do not think that it covers enough people,” he told NPR. “And I read the CBO report, and I think that we have to move forward in a more bipartisan capacity. For example, I would like to see legislation passed that says we can purchase policy across state lines. That of course will require support from Democratic colleagues. And I challenge Democratic colleagues to come to the table and help repair the ACA.”

Frank A. LoBiondo – Congressman LoBiondo of New Jersey said that his constituents who rely on Medicare would be harmed under the AHCA. “Under the current proposal, many South Jersey residents would be left with financial hardship or without the coverage they now receive,” he said in a statement. “Our seniors on Medicare already struggle to make each dollar stretch. Three South Jersey counties have more than 30 percent of their residents receiving Medicaid assistance. Medical professionals – our hospitals, doctors, nurses – are opposed.”

[The DCCC has targeted LoBiondo for the 2018 midterms]

Thomas Massie – Congressman Massie of Kentucky was very much opposed to the American Health Care Act to the point that he actually said in an interview that it’s worse than Obamacare. According to Politico, he said that the bill relies on “replacing mandates, subsidies and penalties with mandates, subsidies and penalties.” In late March, he jokingly tweeted that he was changing his vote from “No” to “Hell No.”

Patrick Meehan – Congressman Meehan of Pennsylvania said in a statement that the AHCA “threatens to send premiums skyrocketing for people with pre-existing conditions,” adding that it will “make coverage more expensive for for older Americans as they near retirement.”

[The DCCC has targeted Meehan for the 2018 midterms]

Dave Reichert – Congressman Reichert just recently announced that he would be voting against the AHCA. “This bill although a good attempt falls short,” he told a reporter on Thursday.

[The DCCC has targeted Reichert for the 2018 midterms]

Ileana Ros-Lehtinen – Congresswoman Ros-Lehtinen said in a statement, “I will not support a bill that has the potential to severely harm the health and lives of people in South Florida and therefore I remain steadfast in my commitment to vote NO on the AHCA. The recent addition of further funds to high risk pools continues to be inadequate and fails to cover those who need it most. If enacted, the older and poorer South Floridians will be worse off and will find it more difficult to obtain quality healthcare. My constituents should not have to take a step backward in their ability to obtain treatment for any illness and thus, I will vote NO.” [Ros-Lehtinen is not seeking reelection]

Christopher H. Smith – Congressman Smith said that he opposed the bill because of its cuts to Medicaid. “The overriding concern I have is the Medicaid expansion being significantly altered,” Smith told the Asbury Park Press. “It affects so many of our disabled individuals and families, and the working poor.”

Michael R. Turner – Congressman Turner of Ohio simply said in a statement that the AHCA would cause many of his constituents to lose coverage. “After numerous discussions with the White House and the Speaker’s office, in an attempt to improve this bill, including discussions today, I could not support the bill in its current form,” he said in a statement. “This legislation will result in people in my community losing health care coverage. Therefore, I could not support it.”

Immediately after Republicans had cast their 216th vote securing passage of the American Health Care Act, the embittered, infantile Democrats began deriding them by singing “Na Na Na Na Na Na Hey Hey Hey GOODBYE.”  Several jackasses began waving goodbye implying the Republicans had just cost themselves their political careers.

No, the Republicans who voted "no" are the ones in danger of wrecking their political aspirations.

Americans hate Beltway politicians for precisely this reason.

Ten representatives, those I have highlighted, may fall prey to the Democrats in 2018.  To see a complete list of Republican Congressmen who must defend their seats in the midterms visit Ballotpedia to see who the Democrat Party is targeting including their Frontline Program.

Frau Blucher: Bowling At The White House

President Trump has invited members of the House Freedom Caucus, who are skeptical of the GOP Obamacare replacement plan, to the White House next week for a few frames of bowling.

The Republican replacement bill, the American Health Care Act, cleared hurdles in the House Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce Committees this week along strict party lines.  Speaker Ryan is hoping to bring the bill to the floor in the next few weeks. 

Republicans have been vowing to repeal and replace the disastrous ObamaCare law since before it was passed seven years ago, and with Trump in the White House, GOP leaders on Capitol Hill are hoping to make good on their promise this year.

Frau Blucher (horses begin to whinny) is having none of it.  Speaking at a breakfast in Washington hosted by the Christian Science Monitor Nancy Pelosi sneeringly quipped, “If he’s in a deal-making mood does that mean bowling at the White House in return for legislation?  I mean, I find the charm offensive offensive.  I really do.”

“I think he’s making fools of his own people, quite frankly. You don’t agree philosophically in what the legislation is?  Let’s go bowling at the White House, OK?  Come on.” she added.

Nancy Pelosi must face so many intellectual challenges each day like breathing and blinking that just combing her hair is impossible.

Pelosi’s predictions about Teleprompter Jesus’s signature legislation have been egregiously erroneous.  For example:  by ramming Obamacare down our throats Democrats lost control of the House, she said Americans would eventually love the ACA but they don’t, she was convinced Hillary would win the presidency and Obamacare would be saved but she lost the election.

A few weeks ago Pelosi told some high-ranking members of Congress had Hillary won the election she would have left Washington DC safe in the knowledge that her legacy would be safe in Granny’s hands.  She, no doubt, would have been offered and ambassadorship to Rome and lived happily ever after.

Last year she almost lost her speakership.  She doesn’t have the sniveling Harry Reid or Teleprompter Jesus to help her do battle against the Republican majority.  What a pity. Said no one EVER.

We are making great progress with healthcare. ObamaCare is imploding and will only get worse. Republicans coming together to get job done!

— President Trump (@POTUS) March 11, 2017

You can understand the left and their hatred of bowling. Obama once bowled a 37. Thirty-seven. Not 137 or 237. 37. A grown man.

— Sean Spicier (@sean_spicier) March 11, 2017