The Chelsea Manning Commutation: Obama Tosses Another Match On The Fire On His Way Out The Door

Let me begin this post by explaining the graphic associated with it.  In the background is a dumpster fire representing the Democrat Party The World’s Most Dangerous Community Organizer has single-handedly destroyed.  The mid-ground includes a sculpture by Italian sculptor Davide Dormino entitled “Anything to say?” of whistleblowers Edward Snowden, Julian Assange and Bradley/Chelsea Manning.  The controversial piece has been on display in Paris, Berlin, Belgrade, Rome and the plaza at the United Nations headquarters in Geneva.

Dormino lauds the art saying it "pays homage to three who said no to war, to the lies that lead to war and to the intrusion into private life that helps to perpetuate war”  What a dick.

The foreground is self-explanatory. 

This is the real Democrat Party.  This is the real Barack Obama—an extremely left-wing ideologue—who is anti-law and order, anti-military, anti-America.

Government lawyers cited al-Qaeda magazine in an effort to prove Pfc. Bradley Manning knowingly aided the enemy by posting documents on WikiLeaks.

Al-Qaeda leaders reveled in a WikiLeaks’ publication of reams of classified U.S. documents, urging members to study them before devising ways to attack the United States, according to evidence presented by the prosecution  in the court-martial of an Army private who leaked the material. 

…The government presented another uncontested written statement that former al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden asked for and received from an associate the Afghanistan battlefield reports that WikiLeaks published. The material was found on digital media seized in the May 2011 raid on bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, [lead prosecutor Maj. Ashden] Fein said. Bin Laden was killed in the raid.

These “battlefield reports” are what WikiLeaks refers to as the “Afghan War Diary,” a trove of “over 91,000 reports covering the war in Afghanistan from 2004 to 2010.” WikiLeaks withheld 15,000 of these reports from its initial release because even the anti-government group recognized the sensitivity of their contents. Still, the diary covers a “range of topics”: “Improvised Explosives Devices encountered, offensive operations, taking enemy fire, engagement with possible hostile forces, talking with village elders, numbers of wounded, dead, and detained, kidnappings, broader intelligence information and explicit threat warnings from intercepted radio communications, local informers or the [Afghan] police.”

The files Manning copied included about 250,000 diplomatic cables from American embassies around the world showing sensitive deals and conversations, dossiers detailing intelligence assessments of Guantánamo detainees held without trial, and a video of an American helicopter attack in Baghdad in which two Reuters journalists were killed, among others.

Obama frees Wikileaks' chief leaker and ally.

He and other Democrats can stop feigning outrage about Russia, leaks, and hacking now.

— Mat (@sunnyright) January 17, 2017

Tell me again how President-elect Trump is the biggest danger to the intelligence community ever to sit in the Oval Office.

— jimgeraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 17, 2017

Obama should pardon that diaper-wearing astronaut love triangle lady. That story was funny.

— jon gabriel (@exjon) January 18, 2017

And Balloon Boy's Dad. https://t.co/ONx14asmfT

— Tom O'C (@teeocee) January 18, 2017

DNC Rent-Boy John Harwood

The journalist who was exposed in the Podesta emails by WikiLeaks for his unethical relationship with the Clinton campaign foolishly hosted his own poll on Twitter asking who Americans believed regarding the hacking of the DNC:  WikiLeaks, or the US intelligence community.

CNBC/NYTimes 'journalist' John Harwood, who was exposed in #PodestaEmails helping Clinton, takes a poll https://t.co/SJIWglRoxB pic.twitter.com/SiCBS3arkN

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) January 6, 2017

This is the same media rent-boy who asked Podesta “What should I ask Jeb?” in advance of an interview with the candidate.  And he’s the same hustler who was so very, very proud of himself for asking Donald Trump if he was “running a comic book version of a presidential campaign” during the GOP debate in October 2015.

Harwood’s poll would be meaningful only in the context of the echo chamber from which he preaches but for the fact that it backfired astonishingly. 

This is unprecedented! The last time Russians tried to interfere in our election was 2012, and the time before that was way back in 2008.

— Josh Earnst (@NotJoshEarnest) January 8, 2017

Has the media figured out who's been in charge while Russia was hacking us with impunity?

— Josh Earnst (@NotJoshEarnest) January 8, 2017

UPDATE:  We wish to thank Right Reasons for featuring this graphic on its Today’s Toons for 1/11/17. 

Hillary’s Coziness With The Russians Has Been Interrupted By The Election

Those annoying document dumps, courtesy of Russia, just keep gumming up the works for Granny don’t they?

Desperate, and I do mean desperate, for a debate bailout Hillary addressed Russia’s alleged interference in the presidential election by calling her opponent a “puppet” of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“It’s pretty clear the Russians have engaged in cyber attacks against the United States of America, that you encouraged espionage against our people, that you are willing to spout the Putin line, sign up for his wish list, break up NATO, do whatever he wants to do and that you continue to get help from him because he has a very clear favorite in this race,” Clinton asserted.

“I don’t know Putin,” Trump said. “He said nice things about me. If we got along well, that would be good. He has no respect for her. He has no respect for our president, and I’ll tell you what—we’re in very serious trouble because we have a country with tremendous numbers of nuclear warheads.  From everything I see has no respect for this person.”

"Well, that’s because he'd rather have a puppet for president of the United States and it's pretty clear," Clinton fired back.

"No puppet. You’re the puppet," Trump immediately said.

She squirmed, and noticeably so, at the charge.

WikiLeaks laid bare that the former Secretary of State didn't see Russia as a problem.  On May 29, 2013 Granny recounted a meeting with Putin while SOS.

“We talked about a lot of issues that were not the hot-button issues between us, you know, his view on missile defense, which we think is misplaced because, you know, we don’t believe that there will be a threat from Russia.”

Six days later at an annual conference for Goldman Sachs CEOs Clinton chirped, “I would love it if we could continue to build a more positive relationship with Russia.”

Granny and Bubba Clinton, as well as campaign chairman John Podesta, enjoyed a close relationship with Russian interests throughout The World’s Most Dangerous Community Organizer’s regime.. Podesta’s emails reveal that he sat on the board of directors and owned 75,000 shares of the Russian-backed Joule Unlimited. He has transferred those shares to an anonymous holding company.

Bubba received a $500K speaking fee from Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment firm, on June 29, 2010, just as the Russians announced their intention of buying Uranium One and with it one-fifth of the U.S. uranium supply.

From The New York Times, a publication loathe to criticize the unindicted felon:

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One. 

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton. 

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well. 

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock. 

At the time, both Rosatom [Russian atomic energy agency] and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show.

Remember this hot mic moment from 2012 just before the general election?

Hillary Can’t Stand “Everyday” Americans

“Hillary was revealed in leaked emails saying she can’t stand the phrase everyday Americans. They also reveal her telling Goldman Sachs she knows little of the middle class. They teach you in Methodist Sunday school to always respect the middle class; otherwise they revolt and overthrow you.” — Argus Hamilton

Rick Rolled By WikiLeaks/Julian Assange

Julian Assange held off releasing information about the US elections or Hillary Clinton in a highly anticipated press conference early this morning.  Thousands of viewers of the live-streamed event were left feeling they had been rick rolled.  Assange said, “There’s enormous expectation in the United States.  Some of that expectation will be partly answered, but you understand that if we’re going to make a major publication in the United States at a particular hour we won’t do it at 300 AM.”

Asked during the press conference directly about Hillary, he denied that he or Wikileaks “intend to harm” the Democratic nominee specifically, but insisted his revelations would be “significant” in relation to the election.  He said, “There has been a lot of misquoting of me and Wikileaks publications and in this particular case the misquoting has to do with whether we intend to harm Hillary Clinton.  All those are false."

“Our upcoming publications are significant in relation to the US elections. Do they show interesting features of US power factions and how they operate? Yes, they do.”

WikiLeaks says today. Then not today. Then today. Then not today. https://t.co/bFKoHrJmfk

— Byron York (@ByronYork) October 4, 2016

#Assange: Regarding upcoming publications... We hope to be publishing every week for the next 10 weeks. #wikileaks10

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 4, 2016

Julian Assange: "How do we get folks to watch my #wikileaks10 speech at 3am?"

"Tell them we'll leak info on Clinton" 😂#OctoberSurprise

— Yukio Strachan (@boldandworthy) October 4, 2016

My Opinion: Nice shirt #JulianAssange but I think the #Wikileaks10 conference hype was a bad publicity scheme 2 promote buying the new books pic.twitter.com/6FSNSd4EOS

— ←SumGurl07 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (@SumGurl07) October 4, 2016

LIVE Stream: Wikileaks/Assange October Surprise Press Conference

“Screwples” And The Irredeemably Corrupt Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager denial slut, Robby Mook, appeared on MSNBC’s Morning Joe to blast The Associated Press report which exposed the fact that at least 85 of 154 people who met with her had donated to the Clinton Foundation Slush Fund while she was in charge of the State Department.

He characterized the published report as “outrageous” and accused the news agency of cherry-picking a very small number of meetings.

The AP was forced to sue the State Department in federal court to obtain Clinton’s schedules.

Mook cited some of the people named in the report including Melinda Gates, co-founder of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as well as Muhammad Yunus, a Nobel Prize winner, as a defense of the Clinton Foundation.  He would have us believe the Foundation takes money from rich donors and gives it to poor people around the world.

He said Melinda and Bill Gates are "recognized around the world as experts at public health issues." Yunus, he said, is a "world-renowned Nobel Prize-winning economist who is an expert in micro-finance."

"That makes perfect sense for her to meet with him," Mook said.

"At every juncture the foundation set up the highest possible standards to prevent any conflict of interest and the State Department itself has said that there was no conflict of interest.”

Even as his boss, the haggard shrew, continues to brazenly joke about her emails, the evidentiary noose is beginning to tighten.  Her loyalists are soiling themselves in terror.

As the unseemly ties between the Clinton Slush Fund and the State Department became more conspicuous, infamous Clinton hatchet man James “Ragin’ Cajun” Carville told CNN on Monday night, “The press has decided that we’re going to go after this and shut it down.  You are probably going to be successful.  There will be people that are going to die because of this.”  The next day he added, “Somebody is going to hell over this.”

If, in the end, the Clinton Foundation is shuttered it won’t be missed by anyone EXCEPT the hundreds of corporate executives, foreign dignitaries and celebrities trying to buy influence.

By the way, get your Jiffy Pop ready.  WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange is ready to release “significant” and “unexpected” material from Hillary’s election campaign.