Wake Me Up When Durham Actually Indicts Somebody

So, the guy who voted for a communist for President of the United States of America in 1980 is being closely scrutinized by United States Attorney John Durham.  Not for that. No.

Brennan literally cast a vote for Gus Hall, the Kremlin’s man in Washington, to become the next president.  That was the year Ronald Reagan challenged incumbent President Jimmy Carter.

When Brennan was asked a standard question (Have you ever worked with or for a group that was dedicated to the overthrow of the United States?) for a security clearance when applying for a job with the CIA, Brennan recalled at an annual conference for the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation that he “froze”.  “This was back in 1980 and I thought back to a previous election where I voted for the Communist Party candidate,” said Brennan.

In pre-Obama America that little tidbit would have been a sure-fire disqualifier.

So, here we are today and U.S. Attorney John Durham’s criminal investigation into the origins of the FBI’s ”Russia investigation” is “taking a close look” at former Obama CIA Director John Brennan.

The New York Times reported, “He wants to learn what Mr. Brennan told other officials, including the former FBI Director James B. Comey, about his and the CIA’s views of a notorious dossier of assertions about Russia and Trump associates.”

Durham is also reportedly taking a close look at whether Brennan made contradictory statements between his private and public remarks about the anti-Trump Steele dossier and about “any debate among the intelligence agencies over their conclusions on Russia’s interference” in the 2016 presidential election.

Brennan was CIA Director during President Trump's transition into the White House and left office the same day he was inaugurated on January 20, 2017.

Once out of Langley, Comrade Brennan tore into the President, accusing him of “treason” (among other crimes) in countless television appearances and bitter tweets. It got so vicious the President ordered the revocation of his security clearance.

This action is part of a broader effort by Mr. Trump to suppress freedom of speech & punish critics. It should gravely worry all Americans, including intelligence professionals, about the cost of speaking out. My principles are worth far more than clearances. I will not relent. https://t.co/TNzOxhP9ux

— John O. Brennan (@JohnBrennan) August 15, 2018

In addition, the Administration pulled clearances for former FBI Director James Comey, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former National Security Agency Director Michael Hayden, former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, former FBI attorney Lisa Page, former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, former FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whose security clearance was deactivated after he was fired and Bruce Ohr, who is still in the Justice Department.

Part of the President’s statement reads:

“Mr. Brennan has a history that calls into question his objectivity and credibility. In 2014, for example, he denied to Congress that CIA officials under his supervision had improperly accessed the computer files of congressional staffers. He told the Council of Foreign Relations that the CIA would never do such a thing. The CIA’s Inspector General, however, contradicted Mr. Brennan directly, concluding unequivocally that agency officials had indeed improperly accessed congressional staffers’ files.” 

“More recently, Mr. Brennan told Congress that the Intelligence Community did not make use of the so-called Steele Dossier in an assessment regarding the 2016 election, an assertion contradicted by at least two other senior officials in the Intelligence Community and all of the facts. Additionally, Mr. Brennan has recently leveraged his status as a former high-ranking official with access to highly sensitive information to make a series of unfounded and outrageous allegations – wild outbursts on the internet and television – about this Administration. Mr. Brennan’s lying and recent conduct, characterized by increasingly frenzied commentary, is wholly inconsistent with access to the Nation’s most closely held secrets and facilitates the very aim of our adversaries, which is to sow division and chaos.”

You’ll pardon me for being highly skeptical about Durham’s criminal investigation into the unprecedented FBI probe of a presidential campaign, the egregious abuse of law enforcement responsible for an attempted silent coup and three years of media and political hysteria.

UPDATE:  Welcome readers of Whatfinger News.

With All This Manure, There Must Be A Pony Somewhere!

Former CIA Director John Brennan is not your garden variety liar. Brennan is the kind of man who feels quite content to brazenly mislead the American people and then shamelessly lecture us about integrity, decency, wisdom and humility.

Brennan's eagerness to deceive and his long record of supporting radical and unaccountable powers was never more evident than when he cast his vote for Gus Hall, head of the Communist Party USA─the Kremlin’s man in Washington─for President of the United States during the Leonid Brezhnev era.

Brezhnev and Yuro Andropov, KGB chief, were giving the light to Mehmet Ali Ağca to assassinate Pope John Paul II in 1981.

Two of Hall’s most notorious quotes include:

“There’s no question that the United States will become a socialist country. It’s as inevitable as the sun rising tomorrow.”

“We want to overthrow the capitalist system. But the means that we have chosen are ones of mass education and propaganda. We have our newspaper and we appear on talk shows and we will take part in elections.”

Brennan took part in those elections when he cast his vote for the “cause”.

I said all that to say this:  The irony of Brennan’s latest screed in The Washington Post is breathtaking.

The presidents I directly served were not perfect, and I didn’t agree with all of their policy choices. But I never doubted that each treated their solemn responsibility to lead our nation with anything less than the seriousness, intellectual rigor and principles that it deserved. Many times, I heard them dismiss the political concerns of their advisers, saying, “I don’t care about my politics, it’s the right thing to do.”

The esteem with which I held the presidency was dealt a serious blow when Donald Trump took office. Almost immediately, I began to see a startling aberration from the remarkable, though human, presidents I had served. Mr. Trump’s lifelong preoccupation with aggrandizing himself seemed to intensify in office, and he quickly leveraged his 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. address and his Twitter handle to burnish his brand and misrepresent reality.

Presidents throughout the years have differed in their approaches to policy, based on political platforms, ideologies and individual beliefs. Mr. Trump, however, has shown highly abnormal behavior by lying routinely to the American people without compunction, intentionally fueling divisions in our country and actively working to degrade the imperfect but critical institutions that serve us.

Although appalling, those actions shouldn’t be surprising. As was the case throughout his business and entertainment careers, Mr. Trump charts his every move according to a calculus of how it will personally help or hurt him. His strategy is to undercut real, potential and perceived opponents; his focus is to win at all costs, irrespective of truth, ethics, decency and—many would argue—the law. His disparagement of institutions is designed to short-circuit legitimate law enforcement investigations, intelligence assessments and media challenges that threaten his interests. His fear of the special counsel’s work is especially palpable, as is his growing interest in destroying its mandate.

For more than three decades, I observed and analyzed the traits and tactics of corrupt, incompetent and narcissistic foreign officials who did whatever they thought was necessary to retain power. Exploiting the fears and concerns of their citizenry, these demagogues routinely relied on lies, deceit and suppression of political opposition to cast themselves as populist heroes and to mask self-serving priorities. By gaining control of intelligence and security services, stifling the independence of the judiciary and discrediting a free press, these authoritarian rulers followed a time-tested recipe for how to inhibit democracy’s development, retard individual freedoms and liberties, and reserve the spoils of corrupt governance for themselves and their ilk. It never dawned on me that we could face such a development in the United States. [Leon Trotsky, your office is calling.]

On the international front, Mr. Trump pursues policies that are rooted in uninformed campaign promises, a determination to upend actions of his predecessors and an aversion to multilateral engagements. His ad hoc and frequently impulsive approach to national security is short-sighted and dangerous, as allies and partners are left uncertain about U.S. strategy and objectives.

The impact of the Trump presidency will be felt for many years to come. Most worrisome is that his use of falsehoods, his mean-spirited and malicious behavior, and his self-absorption will be emulated by many young Americans—indeed, young people globally who look to the President of the United States as a role model.

The damage also will be felt by the millions of Americans who believe in Mr. Trump because of their concern about being left behind in a rapidly changing globalized world. These Americans have a legitimate gripe that politicians and political parties of all stripes have failed to deliver on the promise that America is the land of opportunity for all, irrespective of race, creed or place of residence. At a time when deep-seated fears of socioeconomic and cultural change need to be addressed honestly and without prejudice, Mr. Trump grandstands like a snake-oil salesman, squandering his formidable charisma and communication skills in favor of ego, selfishness and false promises.

Many have condemned my public criticism of Mr. Trump, arguing that as a former CIA director, I should bite my tongue. My criticisms, however, are not political; I have never been and will never be a partisan. [Throwing the bullshit flag here.] I speak out for the simple reason that Mr. Trump is failing to live up to the standards that we should all expect of a president.

As someone who had the rare privilege of directly serving four presidents, I will continue to speak out loudly and critically until integrity, decency, wisdom—and maybe even some humility—return to the White House.

I have to hand it to the komrade with the bitchy resting face, his line of bullshit is elegantly Trotskyesque.

.@MarkSteynOnline: A reasonable person can conclude the evidence shows that John Brennan and James Clapper decided they were going to take no chances and were going to scuttle @realDonaldTrump’s candidacy.

MORE: https://t.co/ykweMevBOK #Outsiders pic.twitter.com/Q8c80F5s8n

— Sky News Australia (@SkyNewsAust) May 26, 2018

UPDATE:  Welcome readers of Larwyn’s Linx.  We are grateful to Doug Ross for linking to this post.