Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Gimme A Dollar Or The Dog Gets It

There’s an imbecile from the Bay Area of California who suffers from embarrassing delusions of grandeur.  That buffoon is Rep. Eric Swalwell.

Officially announcing his candidacy for president in 2020 on late-night TV on April 9, Swalwell hasn’t moved the needle in current polling.  He’s been stuck on stupid.

From May 16 - 20, Quinnipiac University surveyed 1,078 voters nationwide including 454 Democrats and Democratic leaners asking the following:

If the Democratic primary for president were being held today, and the candidates were: Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Beto O'Rourke, Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Kirsten Gillibrand, Amy Klobuchar, Julian Castro, Tulsi Gabbard, Jay Inslee, John Hickenlooper, John Delaney, Pete Buttigieg, Andrew Yang, Marianne Williamson, Wayne Messam, Eric Swalwell, Tim Ryan, Seth Moulton, Michael Bennett, Steve Bullock, and Bill de Blasio, for whom would you vote?

You don’t need a magnifying glass to see where Eric “Give Me Your Guns Or I’ll Nuke You” Swalwell is positioned because that zero beside his name is as big as all outdoors.

There are two paths to qualifying for the debate stage: breaking 1 percent in three polls from pollsters approved by the Democratic National Committee, or tallying 65,000 unique campaign donors, with at least 200 donors in 20 different states.

So, on Sunday the frat boy fop tweeted this:
On May 3, 2019 Swalwell penned an Op-Ed which appeared in USA Today, and brother it was a doozy:

“Reinstating the federal assault weapons ban that was in effect from 1994 to 2004 would prohibit manufacture and sales, but it would not affect weapons already possessed. This would leave millions of assault weapons in our communities for decades to come.”

“Instead, we should ban possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons. The ban would not apply to law enforcement agencies or shooting clubs.”

Swalwell’s flop sweat over inevitably being at the “kid’s table” for the debates prompted him to tweet: 
It’s easy see Eric is now forced to sit on some street corner with a cardboard sign like some panhandler and beg for a measly buck because the five-spot he was hoping for just isn't hitting his coffers.

Rather than wasting a dead president on a dead campaign, the money would be better spent donating $1 to your local humane society.
UPDATE:  Welcome readers of Larwyn’s Linx and Bad Blue Uncensored News.  We thank Doug Ross, proprietor of both websites, for linking to this post.
Posted by at
Labels: , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please scribble on my walls otherwise how will I know what you think, but please don’t try spamming me or you’ll earn a quick trip to the spam filter where you will remain—cold, frightened and all alone.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)