I spent most of a rainy Sunday
morning watching the talking heads on the Sunday political talk shows and sat
in amazement at the veiled anti-Semitism on parade. I was especially appalled at the heavy-handed
manner in which CNN’s Candy Crowley kept nudging the conversation in the
direction of blaming Israel for the bitter war between the Israelis and the
genocidal terrorist organization Hamas.
A bitter war, I might add, that Israel sought earnestly to avoid.
Mike Rogers (R-MI), Chairman of
the House Intelligence Committee appeared on Meet The Press and Face The
Nation. It was the Face The Nation interview that yielded
the most telling evidence of just how complicit the mainstream media has been
by choosing, yes choosing, to portray Israel as some horrible aggressor.
The point at which this became
evident was when the host, Bob Schieffer asked, as though inexplicably shocked,
“But I thought the Qataris were our allies here?”
"That's what's so
frustrating with the administration," he said "All of this works
together. You can't just pick and choose one particular region; it has to work
in concert. So when you free up $2.8 billion for Iran, when they're already
cash strapped because of sanctions, that means they can continue to do bad
activities in the Gaza Strip, including we believe at least missile
components."
He said that Qatar, which acts as
a U.S. ally on other issues, are also funneling money to Hamas, as are some
sources inside of Saudi Arabia. And, Rogers added, the militant group also
takes legitimate foreign aid dollars coming into the region to put toward
building tunnels into Israel that the Israeli government is working
to destroy.
"Think about how obscene
that is, the hundreds of millions of dollars they've had over a decade. Twenty
percent of the people in Gaza Strip aren't connected to a water source. Ninety
percent of all the water there doesn't meet international standards. But
they've got, I think the Israelis disclosed, 35 tunnels. So they're diverting
legitimate money. And you have Iran that is aligned into this particular
interest in a way that's very, very dangerous," he said.
In an earlier interview on
"Face the Nation," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the
army had discovered a "vast underground terror kingdom" meant to give
Hamas a way to carry out attacks in Israel. He promised Israel would not stop
trying to destroy the tunnels, although he did not specify whether there would
be an expansion of the current ground invasion.
But Rogers warned that the
combination of Iranian and Qatari support for Hamas and for certain factions in
Syria is "intertwined in a way that makes it a very dangerous stew
indeed."
SCHIEFFER: Mr. Chairman, let's just go back to Israel for a minute.
Hamas continues to fire these rockets.
They have poured all this concrete, as you heard Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu talk about. Where are they
getting this stuff?
SCHIEFFER: But I thought the Qataris were our allies here?
ROGERS: Well, this is what makes this region so interesting.
So, you have Iran and the Qataris
are supporting Hamas, and certainly factions thereof. They're also supporting
places in Syria. So, that is why this is so intertwined in a way that makes it
a very dangerous stew, indeed.
It is one common thing that the
Shias and the Sunnis do not like, and that is a Jewish Israel state. That is
confirmed. And I think they have found an outlet to try to do this. And it's
spreading to other areas, Bob. This is what is the other problem. There is the
unseen war in this particular event, and that is the new cyber front.
There are not only what you see
coming from Hamas, attacks on Israel, but now we have nation states engaged in
the region in cyber-conflict that could cause this to escalate in a way that is
very, very dangerous for stability.
SCHIEFFER: How much do you think they have? How much money do you
think has been poured into these tunnels? It's literally millions of dollars
which, as I understand it, came in there to build schools and things of that nature.
ROGERS: Well, again, I think they diverted some of the legitimate
money. Clearly, that happened. Instead of building wells or water
infrastructure, they diverted that money to build these tunnels.
And I think that they are getting
money again from Iran, who has been a maligned force in that whole entire
region. Think about it. They are putting Hezbollah in the fight in Syria and
supplying Hamas in the Gaza Strip with weapons. That is the difficult part
here.
And what is concerning about that
is just about 10 days ago or so, the United States agreed to allow Iran to have
another $2.8 billion released just for them to continue nuclear negotiations.
And that is what is so frustrating with the administration now.
All of this works together. You
can't just pick and choose one particular region. It has to work in concert.
When you free up $2.8 billion for Iran, when they are already cash-strapped
because of sanctions that means they can continue to do bad activities in the Gaza
Strip, including missile—we believe, at least missile components. What they
have—we understand, according to public reports, they have even offered to help
hide those missile systems, and their work in Syria with supporting the Assad
regime.
It's not working in concert that
is helping us cause this confusion around the Middle East.
SCHIEFFER: Well, Congressman, I want to tell you, you have
explained and made this thing even more dire than I understood it at the
beginning of this broadcast.
More dire.
Avi Issacharoff reported the
content of John Kerry’s ceasefire proposal writing, “Israel and the US are
meant to be allies; the US is meant to be committed to the protection of Israel
in this most ruthless of neighborhoods; together, the US and Israel are meant
to be trying to marginalize the murderous Islamic extremism that threatens the
free world. Yet here was the top US diplomat appearing to accommodate a vicious
terrorist organization bent on Israel’s destruction, with a formula that would
leave Hamas better equipped to achieve that goal.”
[SNIP]
Whether through ineptitude,
malice, or both, Kerry’s intervention was not a case of America’s top
diplomat coming to our region to help ensure, through astute
negotiation, the protection of a key ally. This was a betrayal.
Read his entire piece here.