Permit me, if you will,
a brief aside before I begin the Gosnell movie review. As
you will soon evidence for yourselves, I do not write movie reviews for living.
In fact, I haven't written one in a little over a year. I just haven't been
that excited about the Hollywood fare, and even if a movie pops up that I'm
mildly interested in seeing, if it isn't playing at my local theater, four
miles away, I'll wait for it to come out on Blu-Ray. There's another theater in
town, newer and nicer, ten miles away, but there can be a hassle with parking
so...I pass.
But a couple nights ago,
there was a movie I wanted to see, so I drove down to see it... 347 miles...one
way! In the interest of full disclosure, I am one of the film's
"angels". I contributed to the IndieGOGO crowd funding that put up
the money to have this movie made. As such, I was invited to the Hollywood
premiere of the film. It was worth the trip.
The picture starts with
a stake out on a drug bust. Someone had been writing 'scrips for prescription
drugs like oxycodone, which were being sold on the street. Turns out some of
those illegal 'scrips were written out of the office of an abortion doctor, Dr.
Kermit Gosnell. A raid of Dr. Gosnell's clinic turned up a number of disturbing
things.
The movie is part cop
show, part procedural, part courtroom drama. This movie, based on a true story,
has "ripped from the headlines" written all over it. Although, in
fact, there weren't that many headlines written about it. The movie touches on
that. The story of the investigation, the arrest and the prosecution were all tinged
by the "third rails" of race and abortion. The agencies charged with
keeping abortion clinics safe, clean and hygienic were instructed not to
inspect Gosnell's inner-city abortion clinic "unless there was a
complaint". And even though there were multiple complaints, officials
managed to look the other way. During the grand jury hearing, we discover that
nail clinics are inspected for cleanliness once a year, but Gosnell's clinic
went for seventeen years without an inspection.
When the cops arrived
looking for drugs, the conditions were appalling. There was filth and
unsanitary conditions. The smells were unspeakable. We discover through grand
jury and court testimony that when the restrooms were full, pregnant women
sometimes were forced to urinate in the halls. Which no one cleaned up. They
had that in common with the cats that roamed the clinic.
Kermit Gosnell is a
peculiar man, almost charming in an old-fashioned southern gentleman way. He
keeps endangered turtles in his office, which he apparently cared for more than
any human life. His manner and affectation was of someone who did nothing
wrong, even famously playing the piano as police searched his house.
As I said, the movie is
part cop show, part procedural, part courtroom drama. It's a murder mystery that
involved an abortionist. This is not an anti-abortion film per se. The only
evidence of an anti-abortion position was on the first day of the trial.
Expecting a huge crowd of reporters, the prosecutors rolled up to the front
steps of the courthouse, but there were only a half a dozen people on the
steps. Two of them were guards or bailiffs, and way off to the side, there were
two people setting up a card table, with some pro-life signs around them. Other
than this fleeting glimpse, no one is preaching against abortion. It's not a
preachy film at all.
Although the crimes
were quite horrific, this is not a graphically violent film. It's rated PG-13.
It shares a trait with the ancient Greek tragedies, where all of the violence
occurred offstage. There are disturbing things described, including a
powerfully moving photo taken by one of the clinic's amateur nurses (Gosnell
had children as young as fifteen administering anesthesia), which is shown to
the jury and the gallery at the trial, but not to the audience. Yet for
all the seriousness of the subject, there are some genuinely funny moments in
the film from the wit of screenwriter Andrew Klaven, and the deft direction of
Nick Searcy.
The story is powerful
and moving. Do not be surprised if certain moments move you to tears. Director
Searcy, also playing the defense attorney, guides the story along nicely. Dean
Cain plays the detective, whose drug raid lead to a murder investigation, who
can't understand why there isn't a police report when a healthy woman enters an
abortion clinic and ends up dead. Janine Turner, of Northern Exposure fame,
portrays a legal abortionist who testifies as to what a clean clinic, with a
properly trained staff should be. Ironically, her testimony scored points for
both the defense and the prosecution. Sarah Jane Morris plays the
pro-choice prosecutor walking the tightrope of prosecuting the abortionist but
not attacking abortion. Earl Billings plays the title roll with a charming
creepiness about him.
The acting and the
production values are first-rate. The story is compelling and the biggest
question that may be in the mind of everyone leaving the theater is "Why
didn't I hear more about this when it was happening?"
I highly recommend this
movie. It's a crime that was overlooked and a prosecution that nearly didn't
happen, in a movie that the networks and big studios didn't want to make. While
producers are doing reboots of '80s TV shows, Rocky XVII and Fast
and Furious 27, here is an original movie, factually based on a real story,
with a large portion of the dialogue taken from the trial and grand jury
reports, with an important story that needed to be told.
Last I heard, it was
opening in 650 screens. Do yourself a favor and see it.
For another great review, see: WHY ‘GOSNELL’ COULD ROCK HOLLYWOOD, ABORTION DEBATE -BY CHRISTIAN TOTO
