In October CNN released
an ad intended to battle claims the cable news outfit was fake news and to stem
the tide of “CNN Is Fake News” memes.
New CNN ad. pic.twitter.com/GMrkQKojcZ— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) October 23, 2017
The ad copy should read:
“This is a banana. CNN might try to tell you that it’s an
apple. They might scream apple, apple,
apple over and over and over again. They
might put APPLE in all caps. You might
even start to believe that this is an apple.
But it’s not. This is a banana.”
FACTS FIRST
Yesterday, CNN advanced a story claiming to show collusion between
the Trump campaign and Russia; a talking point they have hung onto for dear
life since last year.
Reporters Manu Raj and Jeremy Herb insinuated that Donald Trump,
Jr. was given advanced notice on September 4, 2016 about hacked documents
before they were made public by WikiLeaks.
Raj and Herb claimed to have spoken to two sources who “confirmed the
date”.
In a nutshell, one of the sources was a mysterious “Mike Eckerson”
who no one has been able to identify or confirm as a real person. CBS followed up on the story and made the
very same claim. The problem for CNN is
the emails at the heart of this fake news story were discussed in the House
Intelligence Committee two days earlier.
The Washington Post, of all places, called out the piece as completely false. The folks at the Post had actually seen the
email for themselves and verified it was, in fact, sent on September 14. The files were already in the public domain
and being widely discussed online.
The story turned out to be completely meaningless.
BREAKING: That WikiLeaks email was actually from Sept. 14, not Sept. 4 — which means it is far less significant https://t.co/kMON9rQT7m— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) December 8, 2017
I'm seeing lots of tweets saying CNN should out the sources that misinformed @MKRaju. But @CNNPR says the network does not believe that the sources *intended* to deceive... https://t.co/wKl9rX7Ibc— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) December 9, 2017
You've just completely surrendered the ability to defend any story you do based upon unnamed sources. Surely someone there understands that? https://t.co/eEgaDVLL35— DanRiehl (@DanRiehl) December 9, 2017
UPDATE: Welcome Flopping
Aces readers. We wish to thank
Brother Bob for linking to this post.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please scribble on my walls otherwise how will I know what you think, but please don’t try spamming me or you’ll earn a quick trip to the spam filter where you will remain—cold, frightened and all alone.