An embarrassing kerfuffle started
this week when an über-liberal website published a nearly 3,000 word “portrait”
of self-proclaimed socialist, Bernie Sanders, the saggy-balled old man running
for president as a Democrat in 2016.
In the writer’s effort
to be “thorough” in his portrayal of Sanders, there appears a sentence that
literally glosses over Sanders’ rape fantasies:
“He dabbled in carpentry and tried to get by as a freelance journalist
for alternative newspapers and regional publications, contributing interviews,
political screeds, and, one time, a stream-of-consciousness essay on the nature
of male-female sexual dynamics.”
Sanders’ essay, published
in 1972 in the Vermont Freeman, reads
in part:
“A man goes home and masturbates his typical fantasy. A woman on her knees, a woman tied up, a woman abused.”
“A woman enjoys intercourse with her man—as she fantasizes being raped by 3 men simultaneously.”
According to CNN, Sanders’ campaign spokesman Michael Briggs
is dismissing the bizarre article as a “dumb attempt at dark satire” that “in
no way reflects his views or record on women.
It was intended to attack gender stereotypes of the 70s, but it looks as
stupid today as it was then.”
No, Mikey, the essay
is a glimpse into the psyche of a typical non-violent socialist with sexually
violent fantasies. Now, frankly I’m not
particularly concerned about what this delusional socialist sot said 43 years
ago. What infuriates me is how the press
poodles perpetually hyperventilated for three months over a comment made by then-Congressman
Todd Akin (R-MO) who, at the time, was running for Claire McCaskill’s senate
seat in 2014.
Akin was being
interviewed on a St. Louis TV station when he was asked about his staunch
opposition to abortion in cases where women became pregnant after being raped.
“From what I
understand from doctors, that’s really rare,” Akin said. “If it’s a legitimate
rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down. But let’s
assume that maybe that didn’t work or something, I think there should be some
punishment, but the punishment ought to be of the rapist, and not attacking the
child.”
Akins’ remark was
both scientifically absurd and politically inept and rendered him irrelevant in
his challenge to McCaskill. He was
roundly scolded by the GOP and asked to drop out of the race.
It’s pretty clear
that the aforementioned website is running interference, a smear job if you
will, for Hillary Clinton. Many on the
right took the bait rebuking Sanders for his weird theory. In actuality, it’s best to ignore his dark
little world in view of the Duggar and Hastert soap operas.
Bernie is irrelevant. He’s got a snowflake’s chance in hell of
surviving the primaries much less being nominated by his party at their
convention. Yes, there’s an ick factor here. There’s at least one woman who
doesn’t fantasize about violent sex. So, Bernie got that wrong, but damn what a rumpled, unshorn little maple-syrup-swilling
little creep.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please scribble on my walls otherwise how will I know what you think, but please don’t try spamming me or you’ll earn a quick trip to the spam filter where you will remain—cold, frightened and all alone.