Trump To Visit Londonistan

On Tuesday, following his immensely consequential pick to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, the President and First Lady Melania will depart for the 2018 NATO Summit in Brussels, Belgium.

Following the two-day summit, President Trump will visit Londonistan where noted idiot Sadiq Khan, London’s first Muslim mayor, granted permission for anti-Trump protesters to fly a “Trump Baby” blimp over Parliament Square Gardens.

If this enrages you you’re not alone.  A throng of Brits are likewise enraged.  Yanny Bruere, originally from Northampton in the UK now living in Spain, raised enough money to fly a “Baby Khan” blimp to counter the “Trump Baby”.

According to Voice of Europe, “It shows that the country does not approve of Sadiq Khan’s approval of a balloon mocking President Trump. Normally, this sort of balloon would not be approved, so this is bending rules to allow this.”

“The counter-campaign for a balloon depiction of the London mayor in a nappy to go up demonstrates people throughout the country are disgusted and embarrassed by Mr. Khan’s disrespect of the US President. There is also a march on 14 July to welcome President Trump in London.”

Trump and Khan have frequently taken shots at each other, beginning last June when the President accused Khan of having a “pathetic” response to the London Bridge terror attack, which resulted in eight deaths and 48 injuries.

The Muslim mayor made waves last year when he shrugged off terror attacks as just another annoyance of big city life, seemingly no different than traffic jams or busy sidewalks.

Khan's remarks came after a terrorist ran down London residents and tourists on the Westminster Bridge near Parliament, killing 8 people and injuring 48 more. He said terror attacks in London were "part and parcel of living in a big city," which set off a firestorm of criticism that the mayor was not taking terror threats seriously.

It wasn't the only time Khan stuck his foot in his mouth.

In May 2016, Khan also condemned then-candidate Donald Trump's proposed travel ban saying it was "ignorant" and that "London has proved him wrong" in its inclusive approach to counter-terrorism.

If anything, Europe has become the poster child of what not to do regarding national security.

The Gatestone Institute noted, "London is more Islamic than many Muslim countries put together", according to Maulana Syed Raza Rizvi, one of the Islamic preachers who now lead "Londonistan", as the journalist Melanie Phillips has called the English capital. No, Rizvi is not a right-wing extremist. Wole Soyinka, a Nobel Laureate for Literature, was less generous; he called the UK "a cesspit for Islamists".

"Terrorists cannot stand London multiculturalism", London's mayor Sadiq Khan said after the recent deadly terror attack at Westminster. The opposite is true: British multiculturalists are feeding Islamic fundamentalism. Above all, Londonistan, with its new 423 mosques, is built on the sad ruins of English Christianity."

Scotland Yard announced last year there are at least 3,500 jihadis in Britain with estimates weighing in at more than 23,000 operating in cells and actively plotting murderous terror attacks.

In a November 2017 published report The Telegraph (UK) cited the Pew Research Center’s projection that the Muslim population in the United Kingdom will triple in 30 years. An estimated 43 percent of all migrants between 2010 and mid-2016 were Muslims.

The UK also has one of the largest gaps in fertility rates between Muslims and non-Muslims, with Muslim women having an average of 2.9 children compared to the 1.8 had by non-Muslims.

This means that even if migration were to stop completely, the group's population share would rise by more than 3 per cent in the UK, as well as in France, Italy, and Belgium.

If migration continues at the same rate but refugee movement stops, the UK will have the highest overall population of Muslims in the EU, at 13 million, making up 16.7 per cent of the population. 

If you think that’s Britain’s problem, you’d be wrong.  The United Kingdom is one of 38 countries participating in the U.S. Visa Waiver Program.  VWP enables most citizens or nationals can to travel to the United States.  Nationals of VWP countries who have traveled to or been present in Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia and Yemen are prohibited from traveling here.

Why am I discussing a damned passport?  Watch this terrifying video and you’ll understand perfectly.

Rudy Giuliani: There Is No More Time Left To Revive Our Great Country

I hope those folks who were interested in watching the first night of the RNC Convention from Cleveland did so without the filter of network or cable news channels.  I don’t need network news anchors’ to tell me what I’m seeing and hearing and I’m certainly not willing to listen to the foolish pundits on cable.  I opted to watch the convention on C-SPAN.

“Make America Safe Again” was the theme for the first night and one speaker chosen to touch on this theme was Pat Smith, the mother of Sean Smith who was one of four Americans killed in the hours-long embassy attack in Benghazi.  As the delegates listened to the pain in the grieving mother’s voice, the cameras panned the floor of the convention capturing the tears shed by so many as she angrily declared that she “personally” blamed Clinton for her son’s death.

"In an email to her daughter shortly after the attack, Hillary Clinton blamed it on terrorism," said Smith.  "But when I saw Hillary Clinton at Sean’s coffin ceremony, just days later, she looked me squarely in the eye and told me a video was responsible.  Since then, I have repeatedly asked Hillary Clinton to explain to me the real reason why my son is dead. I’m still waiting."

The Hill reported MSNBC's Chris Matthews was asked for his reaction to the speech:

"I don't understand why the Republicans would choose to put this on prime-time television when they have such wonderful stories of American heroism to speak to the American people.  I think it was wrong.” 

"I don't care what that woman up there, the mother, has felt," he continued. "Her emotions are her own. But for the country in choosing a leader, it's wrong to have someone get up there and tell a lie about Hillary Clinton. It's not true. It's logically not true. I think it's wrong that they ruined their evening with this." 

For me, the most powerful moment in the convention’s first night was the speech given by “America’s Mayor”, Rudy Giuliani.  I bear no shame in saying that I rose to my feet hearing his impassioned words.  Here are some excerpts from his speech.  (The video is embedded below in case you missed it.)

“In the last seven months, there have been five major Islamic extremist terrorists attacks on us and our allies. We must not be afraid to define our enemy.” 

“It is Islamic extremist terrorism. I did not say all of Islam. I said Islamic extremist terrorism.” 

“Failing to identify them properly maligns decent Muslims around the world. It also sets up a fear of being politically incorrect that can have serious consequences. And it has.” 

“This is why our enemies see us as weak and vulnerable.” 

“To defeat Islamic extremist terrorism we must put them on defense. If they are at war against us—which they have declared—we must commit ourselves to unconditional victory against them.” 

“This includes undoing one of the worst deals America ever made—Obama’s Nuclear Agreement with Iran that will eventually let them become a nuclear power and put billions of dollars back into a country that the world’s biggest state sponsor of terrorism.” 

“It was Hillary Clinton who advocated for the overthrow of Qaddafi in Libya. Now Libya is in chaos. Hillary Clinton is accountable for this and much more.” 

“Her dereliction of duty and failure to keep her people safe played a major role in the horrific Islamic terrorist murders on September 11-12, 2012 in Benghazi which claimed the lives of four brave Americans; our Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, U.S. Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith, and CIA agents Tyrone S. Woods, and Glen Doherty.” 

“And Clinton, and the Obama administration, for political reasons lied about the purpose of the attacks including her lying directly to the families of those who were killed.” 

“Hillary Clinton’s answer to Congress about the death of these four brave Americans because of her failures as Secretary of State was ‘what difference at this point does it make?’” 

“Watch the video for yourself and see the arrogant disregard for American lives lost unnecessarily. Make up your own mind.” 

“Anyone who can say that it makes no difference how or why people serving America are killed, should not be entrusted with the awesome responsibility to protect them and us and should not be allowed to be our Commander-in-Chief.” 

“She is in favor of taking in Syrian refugees even though the Islamic state has told us they are going to put their operatives in these groups so they can carry out terrorist acts against us and our allies.” 

“We can’t afford to repeat the mistakes of the past.” 

“Hillary CIinton’s experience is the basis for her campaign. Well, Hillary Clinton’s experience is exactly the reason she should not be our president.” 

“There is no more time for us left to revive our great country. No more time to repeat our mistakes of the past.”

A Free And Independent Great Britain

Watch: David Cameron fights back the tears as he announces his resignation https://t.co/N7H5RGRl0p

— Sky News (@SkyNews) June 24, 2016

Founded in 1993, the European Union can trace its origins to the Schuman Declaration formulated by French Foreign Minister Robert Schuman in May 1950.  In the decades that followed, the EU escalated into an unwieldy organization of economic and political power headquartered in Brussels, Belgium with little to no concern for economic freedom, national sovereignty or democratic accountability.  The greedy elites who assumed power cast the economies from Greece to Portugal to France into massive debts, skyrocketing unemployment and dismal economic competitiveness.

Margaret Thatcher condemned the EU as “perhaps the greatest folly of the modern era.”  The Iron Lady was right.  London is no longer English; to wit, the recent election of a Muslim as the mayor of the EU’s largest city.

Demented radical cleric Anjem Choudary, who is facing trial just days from now over allegedly encouraging people to travel to territory controlled by ISIS terrorists, espousing sharia law for Britain and inciting support for the caliphate called for the UK to remain in the EU.

Why would such a sicko prefer that Britain remain in the EU?  He prefers the European Court’s stance on Islamic extremism to that of the British government.  He said, “I think there are certain principles and caveats with EU legislation that should prevent the prosecution of Islamists.” 

In 2013, London stood horrified as two radical Islamic terrorists repeatedly stabbed and decapitated a British soldier in the Woolrich section of London.   They shouted “Allahu Akbar” as they clutched the bloody meat cleaver and knife used in the atrocity declaring, “You and your kids will be next.”

Nigel Farage, MEP for the UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party) strongly fought for Britain to get her borders and her sovereignty back from a failed political union that is now a disaster zone.  Farage insisted “the Eurozone crisis was causing human misery on a shocking scale” and was unresponsive to the “many problems in the modern world.”

The air must taste sweeter, this sunny morning…Congratulations on asserting your FREEDOM!

Guns Are The Problem

It’s been a week since America witnessed the horrifying massacre in Orlando and what a week it’s been.

While the corpses of innocents lay strewn across the floor of the Pulse nightclub, our betters at The New York Times editorial board wasted no time in blaming “American politics” for the rampage.  Jumping to ridiculous conclusions, as is their wont, the board declared the assassin “was driven by hatred toward gays and lesbians.”

The World’s Most Dangerous Community Organizer who promised hope and change never seemed so small and hopeless as when he launched into his invective following a meeting of the National Security Council:

“For a while now, the main contribution of some of my friends on the other side of the aisle have made in the fight against ISIL is to criticize this administration and me for not using the phrase ‘radical Islam.’ That's the key, they tell us. We can't beat ISIL unless we call them radical Islamists.” 

“What exactly would using this label accomplish? What exactly would it change? Would it make ISIL less committed to trying to kill Americans? Would it bring in more allies? Is there a military strategy that is served by this?” 

“The answer is none of the above. Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away. This is a political distraction.”

“Not once has an adviser of mine said, ‘Man, if we really use that phrase, we're going to turn this whole thing around.’ Not once.”

One day after the carnage an avalanche of evidence emerged which made it clear the Orlando killer was a jihadist—a radical Islamic terrorist—and yet he stubbornly clutches at pearls like gun control as he defiantly soft pedals links to Islam.

I remember well when ISIS burned alive in a cage Jordanian pilot First Lt. Moaz al-Kasasbeh while King Abdullah was visiting Washington.  The release of the horrifying video prompted the king to cut short his visit and return to Jordan amid revulsion and outrage for the grisly killing.

While the king’s plane was still in the air, he ordered the execution of two convicted terrorists with connections to the Islamic State.

In Syria, the government denounced the group that has been fighting it for months, but so did al-Qaeda fighters who oppose both the government and the Islamic State. In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian government for once agreed on something, the barbarity of the militant group for the way it murdered the Jordanian.  And in Cairo, Grand Imam Ahmed al-Tayeb, the head of the 1,000-year-old Al Azhar institute, was so angered that he called for the Islamic State’s extremists to be “killed, or crucified, or their hands and legs cut off.”

Contrast the king’s reaction to that of the current occupant of the Oval Office who took exactly 7 minutes to make his way from the podium to his golf cart following his Martha’s Vineyard vacation press conference to speak of James Foley’s beheading at the hands of ISIS terrorists.

He spent the rest of the afternoon on the links even as a firestorm of criticism erupted over what many saw as a callous indifference to the slaughter he had just condemned.

Use of the word “Islamophobia” is a potent weapon the Left uses as a cudgel to terminate rational discussion about radical Islamic terrorism.  On September 25, 2012 while addressing the 67th session of the United Nations General Assembly, The World’s Most Dangerous Community Organizer uttered these words:

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

From Judicial Watch we learn that since 2009, at least seven Islamists (the Tsarnaevs, Muhammad, Zazi, Hassan, Abdulmutallab, Shahzad) have attempted to conduct attacks in the United States— undetected by either the law enforcement or intelligence communities. Likewise, Muslim political pressure and community groups have failed to identify, warn authorities or interdict these terrorists. In 2011, as the Obama administration was carrying out the training curricula purge demands of groups like CAIR, the Russian government was, without success, warning the FBI about Boston Bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev.

Certain terms and—in basic Islamic history, as well as the language/publications of the terrorists themselves—have been removed from US government law enforcement and intelligence records. Why? Whose interests are served by not using accurate language to describe the actions of persons attacking US persons and property? Who wishes the historical record to be revised in such a way as to deny facts? Why would America’s leadership seek to ignore almost 1,400 years of history? If “sensitivity” to Islam is a concern, why would we seek to deny the teachings of Islam and its historical conquests—from medieval Spain to Indonesia, and beyond? Isn’t such a denial “insensitive”?

If government officials are forbidden to use terms such as jihad and Islamist, how can they ever hope to conduct the fact-driven analysis required to comprehend and act upon threat information?

The Judicial Watch report continues, “The Obama administration has also taken strong action to combat anything deemed insensitive to Muslims. Whatever the broader motives of the Obama political operatives, this desire to eliminate “insensitivity” is, in large part, rooted in fear—fear of terror attacks, violence, provocations, “days of rage,” burned consulates and protests. American leaders engage in self-censorship out of fear—pretending it is ‘tolerance” and “respect.’ They ironically proclaim that ‘intolerance’ is intolerable and must be eliminated. Consistent with this fear-based approach, in December 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hosted a three-day, closed-door, international ‘Istanbul Process’ conference on measures to combat religious ‘intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization’ saying our government would use “old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming” against Islamophobia.

Two months prior to Hillary’s “conference”, 57 Muslim groups sent a letter to the White House demanding the “purge” of all counterterrorism training materials and “re-education” of all FBI agents exposed to “Islamophobic” training.

In September of 2012 the Obama administration blamed attacks on the US Embassy in Cairo and the “Special Mission Compound” in Benghazi on a YouTube™ video.  That same month, Obama repeats the YouTube™ video lie to the UN General Assembly saying, “The future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”  His lies to the world emboldened the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) to push through a blasphemy resolution at the UN claiming that the video was part of a larger anti-Islam conspiracy.

The Obama administration, according to Judicial Watch, has been penetrated by Islamist influence operators, seeking to advance an ideological agenda completely at odds with our constitutional system. The penetration is, in many cases, by the Obama administration’s invitation. Some of the more public and controversial figures associated with the Obama administration have included:

Rashad Hussain—US Special Envoy to the Organization of Islamic Conference with connections to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Huma Abedin—Long-time personal aide to former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton

Daliah Mogahed—Advisor to the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships and an unapologetic defender of unindicted terrorist conspirator organizations such as  the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA).

Momamed Elibiary—An Islamic cleric named to the president’s Homeland Security Advisory Council with close ties to radical Islamist causes and a prime mover behind normalizing relations with domestic and foreign Islamist groups.  He reportedly leaked sensitive intelligence documents to a media outlet as part of the “Islamophobia influence campaign.”

Mohamed Magid—Executive Director of the All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS), outside Washington, DC and President of the ISNA, an unindicted terrorist conspirator organization. Magid was appointed by President Obama to the Department of Homeland Security’s Countering Violent Extremism Working Group. From that position, Magid was key in influencing and directing the purge of training materials and policies in the FBI and other federal agencies. Magid is a regular visitor to the White House, and extremely influential on Islamic issues in the Obama administration.

On September 20, 2015 Chuck Todd interviewed Donald Trump, Ben Carson and John Kasich on Meet The Press following the Republican Presidential Debate from the Reagan Presidential Library.

CHUCK TODD:  Let me wrap this up by finally dealing with what's been going on, Donald Trump, and a deal with a questioner that claimed that the president was Muslim. Let me ask you the question this way: Should a President's faith matter? Should your faith matter to voters? 

DR. BEN CARSON:  Well, I guess it depends on what that faith is. If it's inconsistent with the values and principles of America, then of course it should matter. But if it fits within the realm of America and consistent with the Constitution, no problem. 

CHUCK TODD:  So do you believe that Islam is consistent with the constitution? 

DR. BEN CARSON:  No, I don't, I do not. 

CHUCK TODD:  So you-- 

DR. BEN CARSON:  I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that.

A Rose By Any Other Name...

Hillary: Pretending Away Reality

For the record, that Tweet from Hillary is real.

Via Zero Hedge—Petra News Agency, reported on Sunday citing the Saudi crown prince, namely that Saudi Arabia is a major funder of Hillary Clinton’s campaign to become the next president of the United States.

As MEE notes, the Petra News Agency published on Sunday what it described as exclusive comments from Saudi Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman which included a claim that Riyadh has provided 20 percent of the total funding to the prospective Democratic candidate's campaign.

The report was later deleted and the news agency has not responded to requests for comment from Middle East Eye. However, the deletion took place too late, as the Washington-based Institute for Gulf Affairs managed to capture the report and has re-published the original Arabic Petra report, which quoted Prince Mohammed as having said Saudi Arabia had provided with “full enthusiasm” an undisclosed amount of money to Clinton.

Links between Saudi Arabia and the Clinton family, including with Hillary’s campaign, are well reported. In 2008, it was revealed that the Gulf kingdom had donated between $10m and $25m to the Clinton Foundation, a charity set up by Hillary’s husband and former US President Bill Clinton.

Last year the Centre for Studies and Media Affairs at the Saudi Royal Court paid public relations firm the Podesta Group $200,000 for a month-long project to provide “public relations services”.

The Podesta Group was founded in 1988 by brothers John and Tony Podesta. John Podesta is the chair of Hillary Clinton’s campaign to become the next US president.

Finally, in connection to the Orlando shooting, the WSJ reported that according to a spokesman for Saudi Arabia’s interior ministry, the Orlando shooter, Omar Mateen visited the kingdom twice on pilgrimage.