Once upon a
time, in a country now barely recognizable, a certain errand boy sent by
grocery clerks uttered the words, "This was the moment when the rise of
the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal …"
In that same
lofty speech, a warning was given that 52% of the electorate unwisely ignored
at their peril: “We are five days away
from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”
Those five
days passed and in early 2009, the regime of the errand boy boldly predicted
that if Congress passed his $800 billion stimulus plan that by this time the
nation’s unemployment rate would be around 5.6%.
Fast forward
three-and-a-half years. Today’s weak job
market is affected by things such as the threat
of higher taxes in 2013 (when the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts are scheduled to
expire), the costly
impact of Obamacare, and the harsh
regulatory environment.
This country’s
jobless rate has remained perched at above 8% for 41 straight months. The average length of unemployment rose to
39.9 weeks in June. Companies continue
to be cautious in their hiring making it harder for those without jobs to find
work.
It will take 219,000 net new jobs a month for the unemployment
rate to be below 8% on Election Day if the current participation rate
holds steady.
James
Pethokoukis, writing for American
Enterprise Institute, reminds us that, “Job growth during the three-year
Obama recovery has averaged just 75,000 a month for a total of 2.7 million.
During the first three years of the Reagan Recovery, job growth averaged
273,000 a month for a total of 9.8 million. If you adjust for the larger U.S.
population today, the Reagan Recovery averaged 360,000 jobs a month for a
three-year total of 13 million jobs.”
Hmmmm…it is
reasonable to conclude that the sooner the errand boy sent by grocery clerks is
removed from the levers of power the better.
Hurry up November.
A righteous rant for sure! Well done!
ReplyDelete@Stogie,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the kind words.
Why do you have to go all the way back to Reagan? How about Clinton's job creation numbers, they were quite good and then there is George W. Bush Why not mention his numbers as well because compared to them Obama looks good.
ReplyDelete